THE CONCEPT OF INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PERSONALITY AN INQUIRY INTO THE HISTORY AND THEORY OF INTERNATIOPDF|Epub|txt|kindle电子书版本网盘下载

THE CONCEPT OF INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PERSONALITY AN INQUIRY INTO THE HISTORY AND THEORY OF INTERNATIOPDF格式电子书版下载

注意：本站所有压缩包均有解压码： 点击下载压缩包解压工具

Chapter 1 General Introduction1

1.1.Introduction1

1.2.Problem and Purpose7

1.3.Method13

1.3.1.Introduction13

1.3.2.A contextual approach17

1.3.3.Contextualisation of the concept of International Legal Personality25

Chapter 2 Historical Introduction：Leibniz and the Emergence of the Concept of ILP29

2.1.Introduction29

2.2.The Post-1648 European Context31

2.2.1.Restoration of communication and political modernisation in Europe31

2.2.2.At the crossroads to modernity：rationalisation and the cosmopolis38

2.2.3.Jurisprudential context：identifying international legal scholarship45

2.2.3.1.Prelude-Grotius and Hobbes45

2.2.3.2.The other German advisor-Samuel Pufendorf（1632-1694）53

2.3.Introduction of ILP within Leibniz’Universal Jurisprudence58

2.3.1.Political realism：the concept of relative sovereignty60

2.3.2.Universal justice：natural law and the law of nations68

2.3.3.Conclusions on the emergence of ILP：reconciling realism and idealisrn，sovereign and justice，and participation and responsibility76

2.4.The 18th-Century Interlude80

Chapter 3 Demystifying ILP：Brierly，Kelsen and Scelle85

3.1.Introduction85

3.2.The Contemporary Context of Interbellum Scholarship92

3.2.1.Political context：democracy endangered92

3.2.2.Between hope and fear：the public’s reason versus the irrationality of the masses97

3.2.2.1.Introduction97

3.2.2.2.The public：voice of reason99

3.2.2.3.The irrationality of the masses：threatening democracy and individuality101

3.2.2.4.Conclusion109

3.2.3.Jurisprudential context110

3.2.3.1.Introduction：the 19th-century legacy110

3.2.3.2.The concept of ILP in Interbellum internationallegal scholarship115

a.Restoration116

b.Revision122

c.Conclusion130

3.3.James Leslie Brierly（1881-1955）131

3.3.1.Introduction131

3.3.2.Brierly’s concept of international law134

3.3.3.Personality and the state：towards an anthropocentric approach137

3.3.4.The true subjects of international law145

3.3.5.Conclusion148

3.4.Hans Kelsen（1881-1973）149

3.4.1.Introduction149

3.4.2.The Viennese context153

3.4.2.1.Introduction153

3.4.2.2.‘The polluted political atmosphere’155

3.4.2.3.Intellectual context：conceptual monsters161

3.4.2.4.Conclusion166

3.4.3.Kelsen’s concept of international law167

3.4.4.Kelsen’s concept of legal personality：democracy and reduction178

3.4.4.1.Introduction178

3.4.4.2.Hypostatisation and reduction179

3.4.4.3.The de-deification of the state184

3.4.4.4.Freedom and democracy187

3.4.5.Conclusion：Entschleierung190

3.5.Georges Scelle（1878-1961）192

3.5.1.Introduction192

3.5.2.French context：the Third Republic（1870-1940）197

3.5.2.1.The political context：l’absolutisme des gouvernants197

3.5.2.2.Intellectual context：debating the decline of democracy and individual liberties203

3.5.3.Scelle’s concept of international law216

3.5.4.Scelle’s concept of ILP：defending democracy and individual liberties225

3.5.5.Conclusion241

3.6.Conclusion：Removing the Mask242

Chapter 4 Cold War Bi-polarity:ILP hanging in the Balance245

4.1.Introduction245

4.2.Context of Cold War International Legal Scholarship250

4.2.1.International political context：Cold War bi-polarity250

4.2.2.Intellectual context：two responses to modern anxiety-realism and idealism258

4.2.3.Jurisprudential context：the reinforcement of sovereignty or justice277

4.3.Hans Morgenthau（1904-1980）288

4.3.1.Introduction288

4.3.2.The identification of international law-a set of static，primitive and weak legal rules-as pretext292

4.3.3.Morgenthau’s use of ILP：impenetrability and exclusion294

4.4.Hersch Lauterpacht（1897-1960）297

4.4.1.Introduction297

4.4.2.A neo-Grotian conception of international law304

4.4.3.Federalism and the use of ILP：the sovereignty of man and justice312

4.4.4.Conclusion323

4.5.Myres Smith McDougal（1906-1998）325

4.5.1.Introduction325

4.5.2.International law as policy：authoritative decision-making processes325

4.5.3.McDougal and ILP：beyond obsession329

4.6.Wolfgang Friedmann （1907-1972）334

4.6.1.Introduction334

4.6.2.International law：co-existence and co-operation339

4.6.3.Friedmann’s use of ILP：inclusion340

4.7.Conclusion：a gradual process of inclusion344

Chapter 5 The Concept of ILP Today：The End of the Subject？347

5.1.Introduction：a new age？347

5.2.Context of Contemporary International Legal Scholarship354

5.2.1.Globalisation and fragmentation：‘the age of non-state actors？’354

5.2.2.Post-modernism and the fragmentation of the self:the end of the subject？365

5.2.2.1.Foucault and the‘end of the subject’370

5.2.2.2.Saving capacity and responsibility： Ricoeur and the ethical and moral subject378

5.2.2.3.Conclusion386

5.3.Contemporary International Legal Scholarship：skirting round ILP？387

5.4.Thomas Franck’s struggle with Zeus407

5.4.1.Introduction407

5.4.2.Franck’s concept of international law408

5.4.3.Franck’s construction of the post post-modem self：the world citizen416

5.4.4.Conclusion424

5.5.Christine Chinkin：Opening up the Agora428

5.5.1.Introduction428

5.5.2.The sexed and gendered nature of international law432

5.5.3.Chinkin’s use of ILP：the inclusion and empowerment of the female subject439

5.5.4.Conclusion442

5.6.Conclusion：has‘the loathsome mask’fallen？444

Chapter 6 Evaluation and Conclusions：ILP and Universal Justice-From Mask to Vocal Cords447

6.1.Introduction447

6.2.An episodic narrative of the conceptual history of ILP448

6.3.The concept of ILP revisited： the metaphor of the vocal cords457

Consulted literature475

Index491